Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/22233

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFrança, Ângela-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Ana Isabel Costa-
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Ana Filipa Frutuoso Mendes-
dc.contributor.authorCerca, Nuno-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T14:03:32Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-04T14:03:32Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/22233-
dc.description.abstractStaphylococcus epidermidis biofilm-related infections are a current concern within the medical community due to their high incidence and prevalence, particularly in patients with indwelling medical devices. Biofilm gene expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has been increasingly used to understand the role of biofilm formation in the pathogenesis of S. epidermidis infections. However, depending on the RNA extraction procedure, and cDNA synthesis and qPCR master mixes used, gene expression quantification can be suboptimal. We recently showed that some RNA extraction kits are not suitable for S. epidermidis biofilms, due to sample composition, in particular the presence of the extracellular matrix. In this work, we describe a custom RNA extraction assay followed by the evaluation of gene expression using different commercial reverse transcriptase kits and qPCR master mixes. Our custom RNA extraction assay was able to produce good quality RNA with reproducible gene expression quantification, reducing the time and the costs associated. We also tested the effect of reducing cDNA and qPCR reaction volumes and, in most of the cases tested, no significant differences were found. Finally, we titered the SYBR Green I concentrations in standard PCR master mixes and compared the normalized expression of the genes icaA, bhp, aap, psmβ1 and agrB using 4 distinct biofilm forming S. epidermidis strains to the results obtained with commercially available kits. The overall results demonstrated that despite some statistically, but not biologically significant differences observed, the customized qPCR protocol resulted in the same gene expression trend presented by the commercially available kits used.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (The Foundation for Science and Technology: FCT) and COMPETE (Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade) grants PTDC/BIA-MIC/113450/2009 and FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-014309. AF was funded by FCT fellowship SFRH/BD/62359/2009. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencepor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876-PPCDTI/113450/PT-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.titleOptimizing a qPCR gene expression quantification assay for S. epidermidis biofilms : a comparison between commercial kits and a customized protocolpor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionwww.plosone.orgpor
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPagee37480por
oaire.citationIssue5por
oaire.citationTitlePLoS Onepor
oaire.citationVolume7por
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0037480por
dc.identifier.pmid22629403por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalPLoS ONEpor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
journal.pone.0037480.pdf360,01 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID