Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/36231

TitleEvaluation of antimicrobial effectiveness of pimaricin-loaded thermosensitive nanohydrogels in grape juice
Author(s)Fuciños, C.
Fuciños, Pablo
Fajardo, Paula
Amado, Isabel R.
Pastrana, Lorenzo M.
Rúa, María L.
KeywordsSmart packaging
Controlled release
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanohydrogels
Grape juice
Natamycin
Antimicrobial efficiency
Growth modelling
Issue dateJul-2015
PublisherSpringer
JournalFood and Bioprocess Technology
CitationFuciños, C.; Fuciños, Pablo; Fajardo, Paula; Amado, Isabel R.; Pastrana, Lorenzo M.; Rúa, María L., Evaluation of antimicrobial effectiveness of pimaricin-loaded thermosensitive nanohydrogels in grape juice. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 8(7), 1583-1592, 2015
Abstract(s)Pimaricin-loaded poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanohydrogels with and without acrylic acid, were evaluated as food-spoilage inhibitors in a model system and a real food product: grape juice. Pimaricin was proposed as a non-allergenic alternative to sulphites for protecting juices against recontamination. However, pimaricin may degrade under conditions and treatments (heating, acidification, lighting) commonly applied in producing fresh juices. Nanohydrogel encapsulation may be a feasible procedure to avoid pimaricin degradation, improving its antimicrobial activity. Pimaricin-free nanohydrogels did not affect the growth of the indicator yeast either in the food model system or in grape juice. Conversely, pimaricin-loaded nanohydrogels effectively inhibited the growth of the indicator yeast. In some cases, the inhibition was extended even further than using free pimaricin. For instance, in the food model system, pimaricin-loaded nanohydrogels with acrylic acid (NPPNIPA-20AA(5)) prevented the yeast growth for more than 81 h while free pimaricin was only effective for 12 h. Despite pimaricin-loaded nanohydrogels without acrylic acid (NPPNIPA(5)) were able to reduce maximum yeast growth, as in all treatments with pimaricin, the extent of the inhibitory effect was not significantly (p>0.05) different to that achieved with free pimaricin. In grape juice, both free pimaricin and NPPNIPA-20AA(5) treatment completely inhibited the growth of the indicator yeast until the end of the bioassay. However, the latter provided similar inhibition levels using a smaller amount of pimaricin due to PNIPA-20AA(5) protection and its controlled release from the nanohydrogel. Therefore, nanohydrogel encapsulation may help to optimise antifungal treatments and decrease the incidence of food allergies.
TypeArticle
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/36231
DOI10.1007/s11947-015-1499-7
ISSN1935-5130
1935-5149
e-ISSN1935-5149
Publisher versionhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-015-1499-7
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
document_19881_1.pdf478,81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID