Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/56546

TítuloHow reconceptualization of the self is negotiated in psychotherapy: an exploratory study of the therapeutic collaboration
Autor(es)Ribeiro, Eugénia
Gonçalves, Miguel M.
Santos, Beatriz Melo
Palavras-chaveTherapeutic collaboration
Reconceptualization
case study
emotion-focused therapy
reconceptualization innovative moment
Data2022
EditoraSAGE Publications
RevistaJournal of Humanistic Psychology
CitaçãoRibeiro, E., Gonçalves, M. M., & Santos, B. (2022). How Reconceptualization of the Self Is Negotiated in Psychotherapy: An Exploratory Study of the Therapeutic Collaboration. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(5), 718–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818792123
Resumo(s)This case study explores the collaboration that occurs between therapist and client when reconceptualization innovative moments emerge. Reconceptualization innovative moments are exceptions to the problematic self-narrative that brought the client to therapy and are associated with successful psychotherapy. Reconceptualization innovative moments have two main components: a contrast between a past problematic facet and a current, more adjusted one (e.g., before I did/thought/felt X . . . , now, I do/think/feel Y) and an attribution for what allowed this transformation to occur (e.g., this was possible because I realized Z). The collaboration between therapist and client was analyzed using the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System, which conceptualizes the relationship as collaborative or as noncollaborative. The majority of interactions in this case were clearly collaborative, with the therapist and client working inside the therapeutic zone of proximal development, which is typical of successful psychotherapy cases. Reconceptualization innovative moments begin with collaborative exchanges in which the therapist supported the problem and the client elaborated on the change afterward. Implications of these findings for change in psychotherapy are discussed.
TipoArtigo
DescriçãoFirst published online August 3, 2018
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/56546
DOI10.1177/0022167818792123
ISSN0022-1678
Versão da editorahttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818792123
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
0022167818792123.pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,13 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID