Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/58019

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMorgado, Afonsopor
dc.contributor.authorCavadas, Ana Sofíapor
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Luís Pachecopor
dc.contributor.authorTomada, Nunopor
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-10T15:13:53Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-01T06:00:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-
dc.identifier.citationMorgado, A., Cavadas, A. S., Figueiredo, L. P., & Tomada, N. (2018). Long-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titan. Revista internacional de andrologia, 16(3), 112-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.androl.2017.07.003por
dc.identifier.issn1698-031X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/58019-
dc.description.abstractErectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most prevalent male sexual disorders worldwide. When conservative treatment is unsuccessful, contraindicated or causes unacceptable side effects penile prosthesis implantation is a definitive option for the management of ED. Although considered a third-line therapy, it achieves the highest satisfaction rates as compared with non-surgical treatment. Three-piece inflatable penile prothesis (IPP) represents the most sophisticated implantable device, AMS 700CX™ and Coloplast Titan® being the two most commonly used. Although there are several studies evaluating patient satisfaction with either model, there is little published data comparing both models.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevierpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectInflatablepor
dc.subjectPenilepor
dc.subjectProthesispor
dc.subjectSatisfactionpor
dc.subjectAMS 700CX™por
dc.subjectColoplastpor
dc.subjectTitan®por
dc.subjectAMSpor
dc.subjectInflablepor
dc.subjectPenepor
dc.subjectPrótesispor
dc.subjectSatisfacciónpor
dc.subject700CX™por
dc.titleLong-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titanpor
dc.title.alternativeSatisfacción a largo plazo reportada por el paciente con diferentes prótesis de pene inflables: comparación entre AMS 700CX y Coloplast Titanspa
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1698031X17300717por
oaire.citationStartPage112por
oaire.citationEndPage118por
oaire.citationIssue3por
oaire.citationVolume16por
dc.identifier.eissn1988-6705-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.androl.2017.07.003por
dc.identifier.pmid30300132por
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Medicina Básicapor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalRevista Internacional de Andrologiapor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
morgado2017 vct.pdf486,56 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID