Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/70118
Título: | Validation of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders' patients |
Autor(es): | Vaz, Ana Rita Rendeiro Ribeiro Conceição, Eva Martins Silva, Ana Isabel Pinto Bastos Leite Silva, Daniela Machado, Paulo P. P. |
Palavras-chave: | Clinical impairment Eating disorders Psychometrics Portuguese version |
Data: | Jun-2020 |
Editora: | Springer |
Revista: | Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity |
Citação: | Vaz, A.R., Conceição, E., Pinto-Bastos, A. et al. Validation of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders’ patients. Eat Weight Disord 25, 627–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4 |
Resumo(s): | Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders (ED) patients. Method The CIA is a 16-item brief self-reported instrument developed to assess psychosocial impairment secondary to EDs. The CIA was administered to a clinical sample of 237 women with EDs and a college sample of 196 women. The clinical sample completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory and the Outcome-45 Questionnaire. Reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, validity, and clinically significant change were calculated. Results Confirmatory factor analysis validated the original 3-factor structure showing an adequate model fit. CIA showed good psychometric properties with high internal consistency, good convergent validity with the EDE-Q, the OQ-45, and the BDI. For divergent validity, participants CIA scores in the clinical sample were significantly higher than in the non-clinical sample. ROC curve analysis provided a cutoff of 15. For known-groups validity participants' scoring above CIA cutoff reported significantly higher CIA scores. In addition, non-underweight participants and participants reporting the presence of dysfunctional ED behaviors had significantly higher CIA scores. Finally, for clinically significant change, a reliable change index of 5 points was obtained to consider a reliable change in the CIA global score. Conclusions Our findings support the validity and clinical utility of the CIA as a good self-report measure to be used in both clinical and research settings. |
Tipo: | Artigo |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/70118 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4 |
ISSN: | 1124-4909 |
e-ISSN: | 1590-1262 |
Versão da editora: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4 |
Arbitragem científica: | yes |
Acesso: | Acesso restrito UMinho |
Aparece nas coleções: | CIPsi - Artigos (Papers) |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CIA_FINAL_Submissão_REP_2020.pdf Acesso restrito! | Accepted Manuscript | 530,28 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |