Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80289

TitleHow do undergraduates perceive the use of assessment? A study in higher education
Author(s)Pereira, Diana
Cadime, Irene Maria Dias
Brown, Gavin
Flores, Maria Assunção
KeywordsAssessment
higher education
use of assessment
Issue date2022
PublisherTaylor & Francis
JournalEuropean Journal of Higher Education
CitationDiana Pereira, Irene Cadime, Gavin Brown & Maria Assunção Flores (2022) How do undergraduates perceive the use of assessment? A study in higher education, European Journal of Higher Education, 12:1, 1-17, DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2020.1871393
Abstract(s)Drawing upon a wider piece of research, this paper focuses on the validation of a ‘use of assessment’ scale in five Portuguese public universities with 5549 students. The study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the scale, to describe how students look at assessment uses, to analyse their utility perceptions of assessment, and to understand their perspectives regarding participation in the assessment process. The scale demonstrated adequate validity and reliability based on factor analysis of the internal structure. Preference for alternative methods of assessment was negatively correlated with a preference for traditional methods of assessment. However, preference for alternative methods was correlated with higher scores for assessment effectiveness, fairness and level of participation and engagement with assessment. On the contrary, preference for traditional methods was negatively correlated with perceived fairness and with engagement with assessment.
TypeArticle
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/80289
DOI10.1080/21568235.2020.1871393
ISSN2156-8235
e-ISSN2156-8243
Publisher versionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21568235.2020.1871393
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessRestricted access (UMinho)
Appears in Collections:CIEC - Artigos (Papers)
CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pereira et al Higher Education 2021.pdf
  Restricted access
1,42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID