Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/81030

TítuloDeep learning-based energy expenditure estimation in assisted and non-assisted gait using inertial, EMG, and heart rate wearable sensors
Autor(es)Lopes, João M.
Figueiredo, Joana
Fonseca, Pedro
Cerqueira, João José
Vilas Boas, João P.
Santos, Cristina
Palavras-chaveArtificial intelligence
Deep learning
Energy expenditure
Gait rehabilitation
Human-inthe-loop
Robotics-based rehabilitation
Wearable sensors
Data18-Out-2022
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
RevistaSensors
CitaçãoLopes, J.M.; Figueiredo, J.; Fonseca, P.; Cerqueira, J.J.; Vilas-Boas, J.P.; Santos, C.P. Deep Learning-Based Energy Expenditure Estimation in Assisted and Non-Assisted Gait Using Inertial, EMG, and Heart Rate Wearable Sensors. Sensors 2022, 22, 7913. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207913
Resumo(s)Energy expenditure is a key rehabilitation outcome and is starting to be used in robotics-based rehabilitation through human-in-the-loop control to tailor robot assistance towards reducing patients’ energy effort. However, it is usually assessed by indirect calorimetry which entails a certain degree of invasiveness and provides delayed data, which is not suitable for controlling robotic devices. This work proposes a deep learning-based tool for steady-state energy expenditure estimation based on more ergonomic sensors than indirect calorimetry. The study innovates by estimating the energy expenditure in assisted and non-assisted conditions and in slow gait speeds similarly to impaired subjects. This work explores and benchmarks the long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) as deep learning regressors. As inputs, we fused inertial data, electromyography, and heart rate signals measured by on-body sensors from eight healthy volunteers walking with and without assistance from an ankle-foot exoskeleton at 0.22, 0.33, and 0.44 m/s. LSTM and CNN were compared against indirect calorimetry using a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation technique. Results showed the suitability of this tool, especially CNN, that demonstrated root-mean-squared errors of 0.36 W/kg and high correlation (ρ > 0.85) between target and estimation (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msup><mrow><mover accent="true"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi></mrow><mo stretchy="true">¯</mo></mover></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 0.79). CNN was able to discriminate the energy expenditure between assisted and non-assisted gait, basal, and walking energy expenditure, throughout three slow gait speeds. CNN regressor driven by kinematic and physiological data was shown to be a more ergonomic technique for estimating the energy expenditure, contributing to the clinical assessment in slow and robotic-assisted gait and future research concerning human-in-the-loop control.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/81030
DOI10.3390/s22207913
ISSN1424-8220
e-ISSN1424-8220
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:BUM - MDPI

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
sensors-22-07913.pdf3,24 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID