Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/24922

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Marlene-
dc.contributor.authorMota, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBelo, Isabel-
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-02T16:33:50Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-02T16:33:50Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0273-2289por
dc.identifier.issn1559-0291por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/24922-
dc.description.abstractYeast cells exposed to adverse conditions employ a number of defense mechanisms in order to respond effectively to the stress effects of reactive oxygen species. In this work, the cellular response of Yarrowia lipolytica and Pichia pastoris to the exposure to the ROSinducing agents’ paraquat, hydrogen peroxide, and increased air pressure was analyzed. Yeast cells at exponential phase were exposed for 3 h to 1 mM paraquat, to 50 mM H2O2, or to increased air pressure of 3 or 5 bar. For both strains, the cellular viability loss and lipid peroxidation was lower for the cells exposed to increased air pressure than for those exposed to chemical oxidants. The glutathione induction occurred only in Y. lipolytica strain and reached the highest level as a response to PQ exposure. In general, antioxidant enzymes were more expressed in Y. lipolytica than in P. pastoris. The enzyme superoxide dismutase was induced in both strains under all the oxidant conditions but was dependent on the cellular growth phase, being undetectable in non-growing cells, whereas glutathione reductase was more induced in those conditions. Hydrogen peroxide was the most efficient inducer of catalase. Both yeast cultures underwent no cellular growth inhibition with increased air pressure, indicating that these yeast species were able to adapt to the oxidative stressful environment.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the financial support provided by "Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia" (Grant SFRH/BD/47371/2008).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherSpringerpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectOxidative stresspor
dc.subjectAntioxidant enzymespor
dc.subjectIncreased air pressurepor
dc.subjectYarrowia lipolyticapor
dc.subjectPichia pastorispor
dc.titleComparison of Yarrowia lipolytica and Pichia pastoris cellular response to different agents of oxidative stresspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPage448por
oaire.citationEndPage458por
oaire.citationIssue2por
oaire.citationTitleApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnologypor
oaire.citationVolume170por
dc.identifier.eissn0273-2289por
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12010-013-0205-3por
dc.identifier.pmid23546869por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnologypor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
10.1007_s12010-013-0205-3.pdf217,2 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID