Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/2929

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Silvia M.-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Michael D.-
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-15T14:37:22Z-
dc.date.available2005-09-15T14:37:22Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citation"Policy studies journal". ISSN 0190-292X. 29:4 (2001) 588-610.eng
dc.identifier.issn0190-292Xeng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/2929-
dc.description.abstractStudies of criminal deterrence usually show an effect of certainty of punishment but often fail to find an effect of severity. This is a serious threat to the theoretical underpinnings of deterrence theory. Through both a survey of 39 analyses in 33 published studies and our own reanalysis of an often-used data set, we show the problem rests not with the theory but with the analysis of the theory. Finding no severity effect can be traced to â unbundling the theoretical packageâ when moving from the theory to the statistical models used to represent the theory.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherPolicy Studies Organizationpor
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectDissuação criminaleng
dc.titlePutting severity of punishment back in the deterrence packageeng
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyeseng
sdum.number4eng
sdum.pagination588-610eng
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedeng
sdum.volume29eng
oaire.citationStartPage588por
oaire.citationEndPage610por
oaire.citationIssue4por
oaire.citationVolume29por
dc.subject.wosSocial Sciencespor
sdum.journalPolicy studies journalpor
Aparece nas coleções:NEAPP - Publicações em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
GlasgowPSJ.pdf803,22 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID