Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/33676

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorScapulatempo-Neto, Cristovampor
dc.contributor.authorFregnani, José Humberto T. G.por
dc.contributor.authorCampacci, Natáliapor
dc.contributor.authorResende, Júlio Cesar Possatipor
dc.contributor.authorLongatto Filho, Adhemarpor
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-06T16:45:41Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-06T16:45:41Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0001-5547por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/33676-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: This study sought to ascertain the significance of augmented high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) detection by Pap test using both conventional smear and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in a high-risk population. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a direct-to-vial study to compare the diagnostic performance of Pap smear versus LBC in a high-risk population of women referred for colposcopy at a gynecologic ambulatory clinic at the Barretos Cancer Hospital in Brazil during 2011. RESULTS: The detection of both low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) and HSILs was significantly greater (p = 0.04 and p = 0.033, respectively) in the LBC arm [84 LSIL cases (5.7%) and 148 HSIL cases (10.1%)] than in the conventional smear arm [66 LSIL cases (4.1%) and 126 HSIL cases (7.9%)]; however, no differences were found for invasive squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (p = 0.678). Of 3,071 women who were examined cytologically (1,604 conventional preparations and 1,467 LBC) and colposcopically, biopsies were available for 279 conventional preparations (17.6%) and 325 LBC preparations (22.2%). No significant differences were found between the methods with respect to diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION: LBC was significantly superior to conventional smears for the detection of LSILs and HSILs, but these results did not influence biopsy confirmation. Both methods showed similar performances with high positive predictive values but very low sensitivities.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was partially supported by BD, which donated the SurePath vials and Papanicolaou staining reagents. The study design, statistical analyses, interpretation of the results and manuscript development were carried out by the team of the Barretos Cancer Hospital with no involvement from BD.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherKarger AGpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectPap testpor
dc.subjectCytological screeningpor
dc.subjectLiquid-based cytologypor
dc.subjectPap testpor
dc.subjectSurePath TMpor
dc.subjectCytopathologypor
dc.subjectSurePath™por
dc.titleThe significance of augmentedhigh-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion detection on pap test examination: partial results from the RODEO study teampor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/351789por
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPage489por
oaire.citationEndPage494por
oaire.citationIssue5por
oaire.citationTitleActa Cytologicapor
oaire.citationVolume57por
dc.date.updated2015-01-30T16:12:52Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000351789por
dc.identifier.pmid24135251por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalActa Cytologicapor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
scapulatempo c_acta cytologica 2013.pdf169,4 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID