Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/37930

TítuloEvaluation of propolis and its subproduct as an inhibitor of growth and biofilm formation in vaginal yeast from pregnant women
Autor(es)Moraes, L. B.
Salci, T. P.
Bonfim-Mendonça, P. S.
Tobaldini, F. K.
Toledo, L. A. S.
Negri, M.
Bruschi, M. L.
Svidzinski, T. I. E.
DataOut-2015
EditoraWiley-Blackwell
RevistaMycoses
CitaçãoMoraes, L. B.; Salci, T. P.; Bonfim-Mendonça, P. S.; Tobaldini-Valerio, Flávia; Toledo, L. A. S.; Negri, M.; Bruschi, M. L.; Svidzinski, T. I. E., Evaluation of propolis and its subproduct as an inhibitor of growth and biofilm formation in vaginal yeast from pregnant women. 7th Trends in Medical Mycology. Vol. 58(Suppl. 4), Lisbon, Portugal, 9-12 Oct, 202-202, 2015.
Resumo(s)Objectives The treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is still unsatisfactory, especially in pregnant women, being promising to the utilization of alternative therapies. Propolis extract solution (PES) has demonstrated antifungal efficacy and low toxicity. In addition, the subproduct of propolis extract solution (SPES) is produced during the process of preparing PES and is usually discarded, but can still sub- mit substances responsible for biological effects, such as the polyphenols, responsible for the therapeutic activity of propolis. SPES have not been investigated or used as an antimicrobial agent. Thus, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of PES and SPES on Candida spp. isolated from the vaginal material of pregnant women. Methods Vaginal samples from 291 pregnant women were collected and cultivated for yeasts, which were identified by the classical method and performing susceptibility tests against PES, SPES and conventional antifungal agents. The anti-biofilm effect and cytotoxicity tests of the PES and SPES were evaluated. Results In 38.48% (112/291) of culture was positive for Candida species. There were patients with two different species, being a total of 115 yeasts (82.61% C. albicans; 6.08% C. glabrata; 5.22% C. tropi- calis; 5.22% C. parapsilosis and 0.87% C. krusei). PES and SPES were effective, even against isolates resistant to conventional antifungal (Table 1) and reduced about 25% C. tropicalis biofilm, besides presenting its low toxicity in the concentrations of fungicides. Conclusion Thus, in addition to the PES, SPES can also be a promising alternative treatment, especially in this population.
TipoResumo em ata de conferência
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/37930
ISSN0933-7407
Versão da editorahttp://www.timm2015.org/upload/siteimages/TIMM2015/myc_v58_is4_Iss2Press.pdf
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Resumos em Livros de Atas / Abstracts in Proceedings

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_23445_1.pdf272,97 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID