Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/58318

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorEmiliano, William Machadopor
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Linopor
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Maria Sameiropor
dc.contributor.authorTelhada, Josépor
dc.contributor.authorLanzer, Edgarpor
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T10:03:56Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1556-8318-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/58318-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a multiobjective optimization model to find efficient bus fleet combinations taking into account greenhouse gas emissions, conventional air pollutant emissions and costs. The goal is to minimize, simultaneously, three objective functions, Z1 (CO2 emissions), Z2 (Other Types of Emissions), and Z3 (total costs), for a buses fleet of a transit agency. For this case, there were four types of buses (diesel, electric bus, electric bus of fast charging, and CNG (compressed natural gas bus), which were analyzed in three different lines (South-North, Itinga, and South-Central) in Joinville city, Brazil. The respective data were modeled and optimized using MS Excel. Two different scalarization methods (the Weighted Tchebycheff and the Augmented Weighted Tchebycheff) are used for solving this buses fleet management problem. Different tradeoffs, in terms of the objectives, were obtained. The choice of a bus type is directly related to the characteristics (number of stops, average speed among others) of each line. The electrical bus is the best choice for reducing emissions but has a high initial cost and low autonomy. The results indicate that in the South–North line due to the large number of stops and low average speed, the electric bus is the type of dominant. In the other lines, the dominant ones were the diesel bus in the Itinga line and the CNG bus in the South line.por
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), Brazil.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherTaylor and Francispor
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/por
dc.subjectAlternative fuelspor
dc.subjectBus fleetspor
dc.subjectMultiobjective optimizationpor
dc.subjectPublic transportpor
dc.titleMultiobjective optimization of transit bus fleets with alternative fuel options: the case of Joinville, Brazilpor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15568318.2018.1518500?scroll=top&needAccess=truepor
oaire.citationStartPage14por
oaire.citationEndPage24por
oaire.citationIssue1por
oaire.citationVolume14por
dc.identifier.eissn1556-8334-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15568318.2018.1518500por
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Outras Engenharias e Tecnologiaspor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalInternational Journal of Sustainable Transportationpor
Aparece nas coleções:CGIT - Artigos em revistas de circulação internacional com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
UJST_A_1518500 (1).pdf
Acesso restrito!
2,83 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID