Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/61761

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Brunapor
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Marianapor
dc.contributor.authorRosca, M.por
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Verónicapor
dc.contributor.authorLago, A.por
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Isabel C.por
dc.contributor.authorTavares, Teresapor
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-14T07:58:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-14T07:58:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-18-
dc.identifier.citationSilva, Bruna; Martins, M.; M. , Rosca; Rocha, Verónica; Lago, A.; Neves, Isabel C.; Tavares, Teresa, Waste-based biosorbents as cost-effective alternatives to commercial adsorbents for the retention of fluoxetine from water. Separation and Purification Technology, 235(116139), 2020por
dc.identifier.issn1383-5866por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/61761-
dc.descriptionSupplementary data to this article can be found online at https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116139.por
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this study is to demonstrate that waste-based biosorbents can be cost-effective and green alternatives to commercial adsorbents for the retention of pharmaceuticals. Adsorption kinetics and equilibrium measurements allowed the determination of the adsorption capacity of commercial adsorbents (GAC - granular activated carbon and two synthetic zeolites) and waste-based biosorbents (SCG - spent coffee grounds, pine bark and cork waste) for the retention of fluoxetine from water. For commercial adsorbents, the maximum adsorption capacities followed the order GAC (233.5mg/g)>zeolite 13× (32.11mg/g)>zeolite 4A (21.86mg/g), while for low-cost biosorbents, the sequence was SCG (14.31mg/g)>pine bark (6.53mg/g)>cork waste (4.74mg/g). The economic feasibility of the adsorbents/biosorbents was examined through a detailed cost analysis. Commercial adsorbents present higher costs per gram of fluoxetine removed (6.85 /g, 3.13 /g and 1.07 /g zeolite 4 A, zeolite 13× and GAC, respectively) when compared to low-cost biosorbents (0.92 /g, 0.41 /g and 0.16 /g for pine bark, cork waste and SCG, respectively). It was found that SCG is the most economically viable option for fluoxetine removal, while cork waste, the second less expensive, is the most environmentally friendly biosorbent since its preparation does not generate any solid or liquid wastes. This manuscript demonstrates that the conversion of waste materials into adsorbents has a double environmental benefit for both improving waste management and protecting the environment.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the research project PTDC/ AAG-TEC/5269/2014, the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2013 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. Bruna Silva thanks FCT for a postdoctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/112354/2015).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevierpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147337/PTpor
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/112354/2015por
dc.relationPTDC/AAG-TEC/5269/2014por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectWaste-based biosorbentspor
dc.subjectActivated carbonpor
dc.subjectZeolitespor
dc.subjectPharmaceuticalspor
dc.subjectCost analysispor
dc.subjectWaste valorizationpor
dc.titleWaste-based biosorbents as cost-effective alternatives to commercial adsorbents for the retention of fluoxetine from waterpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/separation-and-purification-technologypor
dc.commentsCEB52082por
oaire.citationVolume235por
dc.date.updated2019-10-13T15:32:05Z-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3794por
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116139por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalSeparation and Purification Technologypor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_52082_1.pdf864,94 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID