Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67477

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Tiagopor
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, José F.por
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Ruipor
dc.contributor.authorFranqueira, Nunopor
dc.contributor.authorFaria-Correira, Fernandopor
dc.contributor.authorAmbrósio, Renatopor
dc.contributor.authorMadrid-Costa, Davidpor
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T10:43:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMonteiro, T., Alfonso, J. F., Freitas, R., Franqueira, N., Faria-Correira, F., Ambrósio, R., & Madrid-Costa, D. (2019). Comparison of complication rates between manual and femtosecond laser-assisted techniques for intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in keratoconus. Current Eye Research, 44(12), 1291-1298.por
dc.identifier.issn0271-3683-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/67477-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the incidence of complications between manual and femtosecond-laser assisted surgery for intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation.Material and methods: This study included keratoconus patients who had ICRS implantation using manual dissection and using the femtosecond laser with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Uncorrected (UDVA) corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction, corneal topography and aberrometry, pachymetry map and slit-lamp microscopy were assessed before and after surgery.Results: The study included 265 eyes in the manual group and 111 in the femtosecond laser group. In the manual group, there were complications in 48 eyes (18.11%); while in the femtosecond laser 4 eyes had a complication (3.6%). In the manual group, the most frequent complications were ICRS exchange/adjustment for visual and refractive enhancement (25 eyes; 9.43%) and late ICRS spontaneous extrusion (15 eyes; 5.66%). In the manual group, 81.25% of complications were observed during the first 3 years of surgeon's experience. Eyes who suffered a complication had preoperatively higher mean refractive (p = .002) and topographic cylinder (p = .003) and lower UDVA (p = .005) and CDVA (p = .002). After a second surgical procedure for complication management visual, refractive and topographic outcomes significantly improved.Conclusion: Manual mechanical ICRS surgery shows a higher rate of intra- and postoperative mechanical and refractive complications when compared to femtosecond laser assisted technique. The incidence is specially higher during the surgeon's first years of implementation of the technique.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispor
dc.rightsclosedAccesspor
dc.subjectKeratoconuspor
dc.subjectICRSpor
dc.subjectManual Surgerypor
dc.subjectFemtosecond-laser surgerypor
dc.subjectComplication ratespor
dc.subjectkeratoconus; ICRSpor
dc.titleComparison of complication rates between manual and Femtosecond laser-assisted techniques for intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in Keratoconuspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02713683.2019.1635165por
oaire.citationStartPage1291por
oaire.citationEndPage1298por
oaire.citationIssue12por
oaire.citationVolume44por
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2202-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02713683.2019.1635165por
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.pmid31226888por
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Medicina Clínicapor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalCurrent Eye Researchpor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
monteiro2019_autor.pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,01 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID