Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/69865

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorDranka, Geremi Gilsonpor
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Jorgepor
dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Jose Donizettipor
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Paula Varandaspor
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T20:29:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-28T20:29:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2333-8326-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/69865-
dc.description.abstractTypically, the economic analysis of Renewable Energy Projects (REP) has been assessed considering Classical Methodologies of Investment Analysis (CMIA) in which only a few set of indicators are included, highlighting the Payback, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return. This excessive reliance on CMIA has been criticized because it neglects managerial flexibility, and it may end up leading to the project's undervaluation. This paper attempts firstly, to identify and describe the complementarity among economic evaluation methodologies for REP. Secondly, a novel framework is proposed for conducting the economic analysis to help decision-makers in identifying the most suitable methodology before proceeding with the investment. The findings of the study suggest that CMIA may be suitable for the cases of projects presenting low volatility. However, the analysis should be supplemented by a new set of indicators for projects with medium or high volatility. The Multi-Index Methodology (MIM), the Extended Multi-Index Methodology (EMIM) and the Real Options Analysis (ROA) are proposed to increase the investors' perception towards both the project's profitability and risk and to account for flexibility. The application of the proposed framework is demonstrated for the case of a Small Hydropower Plant (SHP) investment project. The outcomes of this paper also include the opportunities for decision-makers to flexibly respond to changes in the business and economic market using the proposed conceptual framework.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil. This work has been supported by FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)por
dc.relationUIDB/00319/2020por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectinvestment appraisalpor
dc.subjectrisk analysispor
dc.subjectDecision-Making processpor
dc.subjectReal Options Theorypor
dc.subjectrenewable energypor
dc.titleEconomic evaluation methodologies for renewable energy projectspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3934/energy.2020.2.339por
oaire.citationStartPage339por
oaire.citationEndPage364por
oaire.citationIssue2por
oaire.citationVolume8por
dc.date.updated2021-01-22T11:54:22Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.3934/energy.2020.2.339por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technology-
sdum.export.identifier7796-
sdum.journalAIMS Energypor
Aparece nas coleções:CAlg - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Dranka_et_al_2020.pdf372,84 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID