Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83096

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Joana Garridopor
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Amílcarpor
dc.contributor.authorVarandas, Simonepor
dc.contributor.authorLopes-Lima, Manuelpor
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Ronaldo Gomespor
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T10:08:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationNogueira, J. G., Teixeira, A., Varandas, S., Lopes‐Lima, M., & Sousa, R. (2021, January 11). Assessment of a terrestrial protected area for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Wiley. http://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3502-
dc.identifier.issn1052-7613-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/83096-
dc.description.abstractFreshwater ecosystems are essential to human well-being and most have high biodiversity. However, this biodiversity has been suffering severe declines owing to the expansion of human activities. Protected areas (PAs) are essential for biodiversity conservation and have proved to be successful in stopping species extirpation if managed properly. Unfortunately, they are usually focused on terrestrial biodiversity, leaving freshwater ecosystems aside. The main goal of this study was to determine the influence of a PA (Montesinho Natural Park (MNP), Portugal) on freshwater biodiversity. Aquatic macroinvertebrates and fishes were surveyed, and biodiversity (richness, abundance, Shannon-Wiener diversity, and Pielou's evenness) and water quality (IASPT) indices were calculated inside, at the periphery and outside the MNP. Results showed that the PA does not affect positively either water quality or the two faunal groups monitored. Macroinvertebrate communities were not influenced by the PA; however, the abundance of pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera was significantly higher and size was significantly lower inside the MNP. The richness and abundance of fish communities were significantly higher outside the MNP, except for trout Salmo trutta abundance which was higher inside the MNP. Given these results, the MNP does not guarantee the safeguard of overall aquatic biodiversity and habitats and we propose an extension of MNP to downstream areas in order to increase the number of species (mostly cyprinids) under legal protection. This work demonstrates that terrestrial PA planning and management should also consider aquatic biodiversity to achieve successful conservation.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by: i) Programa Operacional Sustentabilidade e Eficiência no Uso dos Recursos (POSEUR-03- 2215-FC-000096) and Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Floresta (ICNF) funds under project CP01-MARG-QUERCUS/2018 and ii) European Investment Funds by FEDER/COMPETE/POCI – Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Program, under Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958 and National Funds by FCT -Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project UID/AGR/04033/2013.” FCT also supported MLL with a doctoral grant (SFRH/BD/115728/2016).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherWileypor
dc.relation8por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FAGR%2F04033%2F2013/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH%2FBD%2F115728%2F2016/PTpor
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectBiodiversitypor
dc.subjectFishpor
dc.subjectInvertebratespor
dc.subjectRiverpor
dc.titleAssessment of a terrestrial protected area for the conservation of freshwater biodiversitypor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.3502por
oaire.citationStartPage520por
oaire.citationEndPage530por
oaire.citationIssue3por
oaire.citationVolume31por
dc.date.updated2023-03-06T17:25:39Z-
dc.identifier.eissn1099-0755-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aqc.3502por
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.subject.wosScience & Technology-
sdum.export.identifier12586-
sdum.journalAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystemspor
Aparece nas coleções:CBMA - Artigos/Papers

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Nogueira et al. 2021a.pdf
Acesso restrito!
2,88 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID