Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89301

TítuloStimulating critical thinking through report peer-review in a project-based learning by engineering freshman students
Autor(es)Alves, Anabela Carvalho
Leão, Celina Pinto
Abreu, Maria Florentina Queirós Silva
Pimentel, Carina Maria Oliveira
Malheiro, M. Teresa
Oliveira, Sérgio
Ramos, M. P. Machado
Oliveira, Jorge
Palavras-chaveCritical thinking
Industrial Engineering and Management Education
Project-based learning
Data2023
EditoraAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Resumo(s)Project-based learning (PBL) is an active learning methodology proposed in the early 20th century. Nevertheless, it continues to be a very suitable methodology for the current generation of students. Probably, it is more relevant now than before, since recent generations are more motivated by these learning methodologies. This is due to the fact that today’s students are totally absorbed by technologies that, in spite of being useful, are a cause of distraction, in particular in what concerns the most important objective: learning. With PBL, many learning aspects could be explored, from the integration of course content to provide the technical to the transversal competencies such as: critical thinking, teamwork, personal relationship, project management and emotional intelligence development. PBL is used in the Integrated Project of Industrial Engineering and Management 1 (IPIEM1) course. IPIEM1 is an interdisciplinary project developed during a semester by teams of freshman students. These teams should apply the contents and knowledge learned in the five project support courses to develop the IPIEM1. Eight teams were formed with seven to nine members. The project theme involves sustainability and in the year of 2022/23 was to design a production system to value end-of-life clothes. Among other deliverables, student teams must review a report from a different team. This paper discusses the critical thinking developed by the student who undertake this report peer-review by analyzing the feedback given, questionnaire and technical aspects checklist and reports content results.
TipoArtigo em ata de conferência
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/89301
ISBN978-0-7918-8765-3
DOI10.1115/IMECE2023-112542
Versão da editorahttps://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings-abstract/IMECE2023/87653/V008T09A004/1196049
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CMAT - Artigos em atas de conferências e capítulos de livros com arbitragem / Papers in proceedings of conferences and book chapters with peer review

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
PeerReview_CriticalThinkingPIEGI1_Final (1).pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,08 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID