Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/30953

TítuloPerceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education
Autor(es)Flores, Maria Assunção
Simão, Ana Margarida Veiga
Barros, A.
Pereira, D.
Palavras-chaveAvaliação
Ensino superior
Assessment
Higher education
Learner-centred methods
Feedback
Assessment methods
Data2015
EditoraTaylor and Francis
RevistaStudies in Higher Education
CitaçãoFlores, M. A., Veiga Simao, A. M., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1523-1534.
Resumo(s)This paper draws upon a broader piece of research aimed at investigating assessment in higher education. It focuses upon the perceptions of undergraduates about issues of effectiveness, fairness and feedback, particularly in regard to the so-called learner-centred methods. In total, 378 undergraduate students participated in the study at the University of Minho (254) and at the University of Lisbon (124). Data were collected through questionnaires. Findings suggest that the most recurring assessment methods are written tests, oral presentations in group and project work. Participants who are assessed by methods which require their active involvement view assessment as a fairer and more effective process than students who are assessed by more traditional methods such as examinations and written tests. However, conflict emerged as a key distinctive feature associated with learner-centred assessment methods such as project work and portfolios. Implications of the findings for developing learner-centred methods in higher education are discussed.
TipoArtigo
DescriçãoPublished online: 08 Apr 2014
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/30953
DOI10.1080/03075079.2014.881348
ISSN0307-5079
e-ISSN1470-174X
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CIEC - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
manuscript - revised version 1.pdf
Acesso restrito!
Documento principal365,32 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID