Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/65945

TítuloA multiple criteria decision analysis framework for dispersed group decision-making contexts
Autor(es)Carneiro, João
Martinho, Diogo
Alves, Patrícia
Conceição, Luís
Marreiros, Goreti
Novais, Paulo
Palavras-chavegroup decision-making
consensus reaching processes
consensus support systems
multicriteria group decision-making
multiple criteria decision analysis
multi-agent systems
microservices
Data3-Jul-2020
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
RevistaApplied Sciences
CitaçãoCarneiro, J.; Martinho, D.; Alves, P.; Conceição, L.; Marreiros, G.; Novais, P. A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Framework for Dispersed Group Decision-Making Contexts. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4614.
Resumo(s)To support Group Decision-Making processes when participants are dispersed is a complex task. The biggest challenges are related to communication limitations that impede decision-makers to take advantage of the benefits associated with face-to-face Group Decision-Making processes. Several approaches that intend to aid dispersed groups attaining decisions have been applied to Group Decision Support Systems. However, strategies to support decision-makers in reasoning, understanding the reasons behind the different recommendations, and promoting the decision quality are very limited. In this work, we propose a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Framework that intends to overcome those limitations through a set of functionalities that can be used to support decision-makers attaining more informed, consistent, and satisfactory decisions. These functionalities are exposed through a microservice, which is part of a Consensus-Based Group Decision Support System and is used by autonomous software agents to support decision-makers according to their specific needs/interests. We concluded that the proposed framework greatly facilitates the definition of important procedures, allowing decision-makers to take advantage of deciding as a group and to understand the reasons behind the different recommendations and proposals.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/65945
DOI10.3390/app10134614
e-ISSN2076-3417
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4614
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CAlg - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
applsci-10-04614-v2.pdf2,46 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID