Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67850

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorKedar, Amirpor
dc.contributor.authorSein, Sanderpor
dc.contributor.authorAdemovic, Naidapor
dc.contributor.authorPanetsos, Panagiotispor
dc.contributor.authorRyjáček, Pavelpor
dc.contributor.authorDuke, Amospor
dc.contributor.authorMatos, José C.por
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T23:06:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-01T07:00:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.isbn9783857481635por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/67850-
dc.description.abstractAn extensive work was done by COST TU1406 working groups (WG) 1,2 and 3 for preparing a guidance document for Quality Control Plan (QCP) of road bridges. WG 1, 2 and 3 reports named 'Performance Indicators for Roadway Bridges', 'Performance Goals for Roadway Bridges' and 'Establishment of a quality control plan' are already published. Based on these documents and the work done to-date, a new procedure for implementing the developed guidelines for the preparation of QCP for roadway bridges was developed by WG4 members in order to unify the method used and to validate the outcomes of the developed QCP. At the first stage, a set of common highway bridge prototypes were identified including girder, frame, arch and truss bridges. A database was created where each participating country has identified local bridges for developing of the case studies. Nine out of sixty bridges where selected for the first stage of preparing an example of QCP and the case study reports were compared with an objective to validate the outcomes. A guideline document was prepared with unified instruction on how to develop the national case study per country. The typical case study includes few stages which are defined based on the work done by WG1, 2 and 3. The stages includes data collection, element identification and grouping, defining vulnerable zones, damage processes and failure modes, selecting and evaluating performance indicators (PIs) and calculating key performance indicators (KPIs), establishing demands, creating QCP scenarios and comparing them by spider diagrams. First outcomes of the prototypes case study reports are now being updated to reflect the final version of WG3 report and together with the guidelines document will be distributed among participating countries to enable the benchmarking process for the full set of bridges representing Europe common highway bridge topologies.por
dc.description.sponsorship- (undefined)por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherInternational Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectBridge inspectionpor
dc.subjectBridge maintenancepor
dc.subjectCase studypor
dc.subjectKey performance indicatorpor
dc.subjectQuality control planpor
dc.subjectFailure modespor
dc.subjectLifetime maintenance scenariopor
dc.subjectFailure modes, Lifetime maintenance scenariopor
dc.titleDeveloping case studies for implementing COST TU1406 quality control plan procedure for typical highway bridgespor
dc.typeconferencePaperpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
oaire.citationStartPage531por
oaire.citationEndPage539por
dc.date.updated2020-10-28T11:50:09Z-
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civilpor
sdum.export.identifier7401-
sdum.conferencePublicationIABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Reportpor
Aparece nas coleções:ISISE - Comunicações a Conferências Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
FP_65.pdf1,49 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID