Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/72812

TítuloGlobal trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice-2019 Update
Autor(es)Wolffsohn, James S.
Calossi, Antonio
Cho, Pauline
Gifford, Kate
Jones, Lyndon
Jones, Deborah
Guthrie, Sarah
Li, Ming
Lipener, Cesar
Logan, Nicola S.
Malet, Florence
Matos, Sofia Cláudia Peixoto
González-Méijome, José Manuel
Nichols, Jason J.
Orr, Janis B.
Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
Schaefer, Tania
Thite, Nilesh
van der Worp, Eef
Tarutta, Elena
Iomdina, Elena
Ali, Bariah Mohd
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Abesamis-Dichoso, Carmen
Chen, Connie
Pult, Heiko
Blaser, Pascal
Sandra Johanna, Garzon Parra
Iqbal, Fatima
Ramos, Raul
Carrillo Orihuela, Guillermo
Boychev, Nikolay
Palavras-chaveMyopia control
Myopia progression
Myopia management
Orthokeratology
Global
Attitudes
Data1-Fev-2020
EditoraElsevier 1
RevistaContact Lens & Anterior Eye
CitaçãoWolffsohn, J. S., Calossi, A., Cho, P., Gifford, K., Jones, L., et. al.(2020). Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice–2019 Update. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 43(1), 9-17
Resumo(s)Purpose: A survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later.Methods: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.Results: Of the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 +/- 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 +/- 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 +/- 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 +/- 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant infra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 +/- 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %).Conclusions: While practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the pr
TipoArtigo
Descriçãouncorrected proof article
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/72812
DOI10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.002
ISSN1367-0484
31761738
Versão da editorahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367048419302589
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:ASSESSMENT AND ENHANCING VISUAL PERFORMANCE (2018 - ...)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
5.5.154. WOLfFSOHN_19_CLAE_2019 (Global Trends Myopia Management).pdf
Acesso restrito!
990,04 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID