Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/73269

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorForte, Ana Cristina Figueiraspor
dc.contributor.authorDourado, Fernandopor
dc.contributor.authorMota, Andrépor
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Belmirapor
dc.contributor.authorGama, F. M.por
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Eugénio C.por
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T08:17:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T08:17:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-28-
dc.identifier.citationForte, Ana; Dourado, Fernando; Mota, André; Neto, Belmira; Gama, F. M.; Ferreira, Eugénio C., Life cycle assessment of bacterial cellulose production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(5), 864-878, 2021por
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/73269-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Bacterial cellulose (BC), obtained by fermentation, is an innovative and promising material with a broad spectrum of potential applications. Despite the increasing efforts towards its industrialization, a deeper understanding of the environmental impact related to the BC production process is still required. This work aimed at quantifying the environmental, health, and resource depletion impacts related to a production of BC. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to a process design of production of BC, by static culture, following a cradle-to-gate approach. The LCA was modeled with GaBi Pro Software using the ReCiPe 2016 (H) methodology with environmental impact indicators at midpoint level. The functional unit was defined as 1 kg of BC (dry mass), in 138.8 kg of water. Results From the total used resources (38.9 ton/kg of BC), water is the main one (36.1 ton/kg of BC), most of which (98%) is returned to fresh waters after treatment. The production of raw materials consumed 17.8 ton of water/kg of BC, 13.8 ton/kg of BC of which was for the production of carton packaging, culture medium raw materials, and sodium hydroxide (for the washing of BC). The remaining consumed water was mainly for the fermentation (3.9 ton/kg) and downstream process (7.7 ton/kg). From the identified potential environmental impacts, the production of raw materials had the highest impact, mainly on Climate change, Fossil depletion, Human toxicity, non-cancer, and Terrestrial toxicity. The sodium dihydrogen phosphate production, used in the culture medium, showed the highest environmental impacts in Human toxicity, non-cancer and Terrestrial ecotoxicity, followed by corn syrup and carton production. The static culture fermentation and downstream process showed impact in Climate change and Fossil depletion. Conclusions Per se, the BC production process had a small contribution to the consumption of resources and environmental impact of the BC global life cycle.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) within the scope of the strate gic funding of UIDB/04469/2020 and UIDB/00511/2020 units and MultiBiorefinery project (SAICTPAC/0040/2015-POCI-01-0145- FEDER-016403). This study was also supported by The Navigator Company through the I&D no. 21874, “Inpactus-–Produtos e Tecno logias Inovadores a partir do Eucalipto”, funded through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) is greatly acknowl edged. The work by Belmira Neto was fnancially supported by Base Funding—UIDB/00511/2020 of the Laboratory for Process Engineer ing, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy—LEPABE—funded by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherSpringerpor
dc.relationUIDB/04469/2020por
dc.relationUIDB/00511/2020por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectBacterial cellulosepor
dc.subjectLCApor
dc.subjectReCiPe 2016por
dc.subjectClimate changepor
dc.subjectEnergy consumptionpor
dc.subjectWater consumptionpor
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of bacterial cellulose productionpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-021-01904-2por
dc.commentsCEB54388por
oaire.citationStartPage864por
oaire.citationEndPage878por
oaire.citationIssue5por
oaire.citationConferencePlaceGermany-
oaire.citationVolume26por
dc.date.updated2021-06-02T16:59:56Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11367-021-01904-2por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessmentpor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_54388_1.pdf1,87 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID