Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/79871

TítuloEvaluating molecular representations in machine learning models for drug response prediction and interpretability
Autor(es)Baptista, Delora
Correia, João
Pereira, Bruno
Rocha, Miguel
Palavras-chavecancer
deep learning
drug sensitivity
learned representations
molecular fingerprints
Data26-Ago-2022
EditoraDe Gruyter
RevistaJournal of Integrative Bioinformatics
CitaçãoBaptista, Delora, Correia, João, Pereira, Bruno and Rocha, Miguel. "Evaluating molecular representations in machine learning models for drug response prediction and interpretability" Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 3, 2022, pp. 20220006. https://doi.org/10.1515/jib-2022-0006
Resumo(s)Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to guide drug discovery processes. When applying ML approaches to chemical datasets, molecular descriptors and fingerprints are typically used to represent compounds as numerical vectors. However, in recent years, end-to-end deep learning (DL) methods that can learn feature representations directly from line notations or molecular graphs have been proposed as alternatives to using precomputed features. This study set out to investigate which compound representation methods are the most suitable for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer cell lines. Twelve different representations were benchmarked on 5 compound screening datasets, using DeepMol, a new chemoinformatics package developed by our research group, to perform these analyses. The results of this study show that the predictive performance of end-to-end DL models is comparable to, and at times surpasses, that of models trained on molecular fingerprints, even when less training data is available. This study also found that combining several compound representation methods into an ensemble can improve performance. Finally, we show that a post hoc feature attribution method can boost the explainability of the DL models.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/79871
DOI10.1515/jib-2022-0006
ISSN1613-4516
Versão da editorahttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jib-2022-0006/html
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_55770_1.pdf2,14 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID