Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/83314

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Cidália Pereirapor
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Margaridapor
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Ruipor
dc.contributor.authorMeirinhos, Galvãopor
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Máriopor
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T10:27:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T10:27:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-30-
dc.identifier.citationOliveira, C.; Rodrigues, M.; Silva, R.; Meirinhos, G.; Franco, M. BSC’s Perspectives Ranking towards Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study Performed with Portuguese Exporters. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315979por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/83314-
dc.description.abstractBearing the growing competition between organisations in mind, managers are focused on keeping on with the search for strategic alignment and performance monitoring. The literature has shed much light into the field of Management but a guide to monitor the defined strategy via Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is still lacking. Few studies have made their focus the question of which perspectives are the most relevant; it is therefore likely that there are different importance rankings between organisations with and without BSC. Highlighting the need to bring insight into this research field concerning the organizational performance measurement of the BSC, quantitative research was performed, to analyse the different rankings of the four perspectives, comparing organisations with and without BSC. The sample was composed of 107 out of the 250 major export organisations of Portugal. The outcomes confirm that the most relevant perspective is indeed the financial perspective, followed by the customer perspective, a finding unanimous in both types of organization (with and without BSC). For organizations without BSC, in third place stands the internal perspective, but, contrastingly, it comes after learning and growth perspective for organisations with BSC. The perspective of learning and growth differs in its rankings between organisations with and without BSC, as it shows up at third position for organizations with BSC, and at the fourth (last) position in organizations without BSC. This research has relevant outcomes for both managers and academia, as it is still a fertile ground, as it guides managers to identify the importance assigned by major exporters to different perspectives, in order to link its indicators. Despite having different levels of importance assigned to the third and fourth perspective, BSC is known and regarded as a meaningful management tool, even by managers who do not have BSC implemented. It conceivably still has growing possibilities in several activity areas.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work of author Cidália Oliveira was supported by the UIDB/05105/2020 Program Contract, funded by national funds through the FCT I.P. The work of author Rui Silva is supported by national funds, through the FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UIDB/04011/2022 and by NECE-UBI, Research Centre for Business Sciences, Research Centre under the project UIDB/04630/2022.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F05105%2F2020/PTpor
dc.relationUIDB/04011/2022por
dc.relationUIDB/04630/2022por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/por
dc.subjectBalanced Scorecardpor
dc.subjectBSCpor
dc.subjectExporterspor
dc.subjectOrganizational performancepor
dc.titleBSC’s perspectives ranking towards organizational performance: an empirical study performed with Portuguese exporterspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15979por
oaire.citationStartPage1por
oaire.citationEndPage22por
oaire.citationIssue23por
oaire.citationVolume14por
dc.date.updated2022-12-09T20:23:47Z-
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su142315979por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalSustainability (MDPI)por
oaire.versionVoRpor
dc.identifier.articlenumber15979por
Aparece nas coleções:BUM - MDPI

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
sustainability-14-15979-v2.pdf738,2 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID