Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/85005

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Marta Fernandespor
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, Paulopor
dc.contributor.authorTenpierik, Martinpor
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Pedropor
dc.contributor.authorSilva, José Ferreirapor
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Lígia Torrespor
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T11:32:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-14T11:32:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationOliveira, M.F.; Mendonça, P.; Tenpierik, M.; Santiago, P.; Silva, J.F.; Silva, L.T. Shading Calculation Methods and Regulation Simplifications—The Portuguese Case. Buildings 2023, 13, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061521por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/85005-
dc.description.abstractHow to analyse the omissions of thermal regulations and evaluate methodologies that provide building execution or thermal certificates that do not correspond to reality and usually incur costs? We can start by analysing different simulation methods and shading calculations that provide solar gains and shadow optimisation. After evaluating how the regulations define the calculation assumptions and how this calculation is performed, the discrepancies (simplifications) that the regulations allow or ignore are presented, and it is exemplified using two case studies. Using the Portuguese regulation as a case study, it leads to incorrect conclusions or assumptions due to unequal access to solar radiation or the shading factor calculation that experiences the omission of angles or time periods. Therefore, the aim is to propose a calculation process (premises) that minimises the discrepancies between simulation (optimisation strategy) and reality (applicability of strategies) for sustainable output.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financed by Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) (Grant SFRH/BD/2018)/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC), under reference UID/04047/2020, and the Landscapes, Heritage and Territory Laboratory (Lab2PT) Center of Design and Technology (DeTech).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POCI-2010/SFRH%2FBD%2F20182%2F2004/PTpor
dc.relationUID/04047/2020por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/por
dc.subjectSolar shadingpor
dc.subjectPolitical-legislative premisespor
dc.subjectShading calculation methodspor
dc.subjectSolar benefitspor
dc.subjectSustainable citypor
dc.subjectIneffective enforcement of regulationspor
dc.subjectProcess innovationpor
dc.titleShading calculation methods and regulation simplifications - the Portuguese casepor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/6/1521por
oaire.citationStartPage1por
oaire.citationEndPage19por
oaire.citationIssue6por
oaire.citationVolume13por
dc.identifier.eissn2075-5309por
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings13061521por
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambientepor
sdum.journalBuildingspor
oaire.versionAMpor
dc.identifier.articlenumber1521por
dc.subject.odsCidades e comunidades sustentáveispor
Aparece nas coleções:C-TAC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
EAAD - Artigos
Lab2PT - Artigos
Lab2PT - Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
buildings-13-01521.pdf60,36 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID