Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89311
Registo completo
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Matos, José C. | por |
dc.contributor.author | Nicoletti, Vanni | por |
dc.contributor.author | Kralovanec, Jakub | por |
dc.contributor.author | Sousa, Hélder S. | por |
dc.contributor.author | Gara, Fabrizio | por |
dc.contributor.author | Moravcik, Martin | por |
dc.contributor.author | Morais, Maria J. | por |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-06T08:35:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-06T08:35:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2076-3417 | por |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89311 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Europe faces many problems connected to ageing infrastructure which was built in the second half of the 20th century. Bridges are one of the crucial elements of these infrastructures. In recent years, European countries have witnessed many failures of bridges across the continent. For example, the collapse of Viadotto Polcevera in Genoa caught the attention of society regarding its tragic consequences. Therefore, engineers must deal with the assessment of existing bridges which is essential for proper decision-making. Condition rating systems for bridges vary from country to country. Consequently, these differences in the methodology can lead to different conclusions related to the future service of assessed structures. For these reasons, this paper briefly describes condition rating systems for road bridges in Italy, Slovakia, and Portugal and defines the differences in the methodology. Subsequently, the obtained conclusions are compared and discussed. The aim of the paper is to encourage standardization in the assessment of bridge health conditions within European countries, highlighting the differences in the current systems adopted by various countries. | por |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the PhD grant PRT/BD/153494/2021, financed by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under MIT Portugal Program. It was partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020, and under the Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE under reference LA/P/0112/2020. And supported by the Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA) under contracts No. 1/0306/21 and No. 1/0048/22, and the Cultural and Educational Grant Agency (KEGA) under contract No. 020ŽU-4/2021 | por |
dc.language.iso | eng | por |
dc.publisher | MDPI | por |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04029%2F2020/PT | por |
dc.relation | LA/P/0112/2020 | por |
dc.rights | openAccess | por |
dc.subject | Bridges | por |
dc.subject | European condition rating system | por |
dc.subject | Bridge assessment | por |
dc.subject | Standardization | por |
dc.subject | Infrastructures | por |
dc.title | Comparison of condition rating systems for bridges in three european countries | por |
dc.type | article | - |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | por |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/22/12343 | por |
oaire.citationIssue | 22 | por |
oaire.citationVolume | 13 | por |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/app132212343 | por |
sdum.journal | Applied Sciences | por |
Aparece nas coleções: | ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IP2 Comparison of Condition Rating Systems for Bridges in Three European Countries.pdf | 4,54 MB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |