Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89311

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMatos, José C.por
dc.contributor.authorNicoletti, Vannipor
dc.contributor.authorKralovanec, Jakubpor
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Hélder S.por
dc.contributor.authorGara, Fabriziopor
dc.contributor.authorMoravcik, Martinpor
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Maria J.por
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T08:35:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-06T08:35:22Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/89311-
dc.description.abstractEurope faces many problems connected to ageing infrastructure which was built in the second half of the 20th century. Bridges are one of the crucial elements of these infrastructures. In recent years, European countries have witnessed many failures of bridges across the continent. For example, the collapse of Viadotto Polcevera in Genoa caught the attention of society regarding its tragic consequences. Therefore, engineers must deal with the assessment of existing bridges which is essential for proper decision-making. Condition rating systems for bridges vary from country to country. Consequently, these differences in the methodology can lead to different conclusions related to the future service of assessed structures. For these reasons, this paper briefly describes condition rating systems for road bridges in Italy, Slovakia, and Portugal and defines the differences in the methodology. Subsequently, the obtained conclusions are compared and discussed. The aim of the paper is to encourage standardization in the assessment of bridge health conditions within European countries, highlighting the differences in the current systems adopted by various countries.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the PhD grant PRT/BD/153494/2021, financed by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under MIT Portugal Program. It was partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020, and under the Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE under reference LA/P/0112/2020. And supported by the Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA) under contracts No. 1/0306/21 and No. 1/0048/22, and the Cultural and Educational Grant Agency (KEGA) under contract No. 020ŽU-4/2021por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherMDPIpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04029%2F2020/PTpor
dc.relationLA/P/0112/2020por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectBridgespor
dc.subjectEuropean condition rating systempor
dc.subjectBridge assessmentpor
dc.subjectStandardizationpor
dc.subjectInfrastructurespor
dc.titleComparison of condition rating systems for bridges in three european countriespor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/22/12343por
oaire.citationIssue22por
oaire.citationVolume13por
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app132212343por
sdum.journalApplied Sciencespor
Aparece nas coleções:ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
IP2 Comparison of Condition Rating Systems for Bridges in Three European Countries.pdf4,54 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID