Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/90882

TítuloThe prevalence of emotional and rational tone in social advertising appeals
Autor(es)Casais, Beatriz Graça Luz
Pereira, Aline Costa
Palavras-chaveEmotional appeals
Rational appeals
Appeals tone
Informational appeals
Social advertisement
Social marketing appeals
Data2021
EditoraEmerald
RevistaRAUSP Management Journal
CitaçãoCasais, B. and Pereira, A.C. (2021), "The prevalence of emotional and rational tone in social advertising appeals", RAUSP Management Journal, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-08-2020-0187
Resumo(s)Purpose - This paper aims to analyse the prevalence of emotional and rational appeals in social advertising campaigns. There are studies about the effectiveness of these tones of appeals in social marketing. but there is no evidence about their prevalent use in social advertisements.Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a content analysis of forty social advertisements promoting attitudes and behaviours regarding social causes. The selected ads were in video format and were extracted from the YouTube channels of Portuguese governmental and non-governmental organisations. The ads were coded according to the characteristics of each tone of appeals and classified as emotional, rational or a mix of both.Findings - The authors classified 25 social ads as rational appeals, 8 as emotional and 7 as a mix of both appeals. The results of the research show that social marketers have preference for the use of rational tone in social advertising campaigns.Originality/value - This study shows that there is a disruption between theory and practice in social marketing, considering the higher prevalence of rational appeals in contexts where theory recommends emotional appeals for higher effectiveness. This evidence is surprising, considering a previous study that evidenced a higher use of emotional appeals in advertising connected to social causes than in commercial advertisements. This paper focus on how practice may disrupt theory and explores possible reasons for the phenomenon.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/90882
DOI10.1108/RAUSP-08-2020-0187
ISSN2531-0488
Versão da editorahttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAUSP-08-2020-0187/full/html
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:EEG - Artigos em revistas de circulação internacional com arbitragem científica

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Casais & Pereira_2021.pdf186,59 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID