Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

TitleDevelopment of a patient-specific atrial phantom model for planning and training of inter-atrial interventions
Author(s)Morais, Pedro André Gonçalves
Tavares, João Manuel R. S.
Queirós, Sandro Filipe Monteiro
Veloso, Fernando
D’hooge, Jan
Vilaça, João L.
KeywordsPatient - specific phantom models
Cardiac atria
Inter - atrial septal wall
3D - printing
Ultrasound compatible phantom model
Issue date30-Nov-2017
JournalMedical Physics
CitationMorais, P., Tavares, J. M. R., Queirós, S., Veloso, F., D'hooge, J., & Vilaça, J. L. (2017). Development of a patient‐specific atrial phantom model for planning and training of inter‐atrial interventions. Medical physics, 44(11), 5638-5649
Abstract(s)BackgroundSeveral authors have presented cardiac phantoms to mimic the particularities of the heart, making it suitable for medical training and surgical planning. Although the initial models were mainly focused on the ventricles, personalized phantoms of the atria were recently presented. However, such models are typically rigid, the atrial wall is not realistic and they are not compatible with ultrasound (US), being sub-optimal for planning/training of several interventions. MethodsIn this work, we propose a strategy to construct a patient-specific atrial model. Specifically, the target anatomy is generated using a computed tomography (CT) dataset and then constructed using a mold-cast approach. An accurate representation of the inter-atrial wall (IAS) was ensured during the model generation, allowing its application for IAS interventions. Two phantoms were constructed using different flexible materials (silicone and polyvinyl alcohol cryogel, PVA-C), which were then compared to assess their appropriateness for US acquisition and for the generation of complex anatomies. ResultsTwo experiments were set up to validate the proposed methodology. First, the accuracy of the manufacturing approach was assessed through the comparison between a post-production CT and the virtual references. The results proved that the silicone-based model was more accurate than the PVA-C-based one, with an error of 1.680.79, 1.36 +/- 0.94, 1.45 +/- 0.77mm for the left (LA) and right atria (RA) and IAS, respectively. Second, an US acquisition of each model was performed and the obtained images quantitatively and qualitatively assessed. Both models showed a similar performance in terms of visual evaluation, with an easy detection of the LA, RA, and the IAS. Furthermore, a moderate accuracy was obtained between the atrial surfaces extracted from the US and the ideal reference, and again a superior performance of the silicone-based model against the PVA-C phantom was observed. ConclusionsThe proposed strategy proved to be accurate and feasible for the correct generation of complex personalized atrial models.
DescriptionArticle is accepted for publication
Publisher version
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017moraisp.pdf1,16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID