Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/56621

TítuloThe emergence of innovative moments in narrative therapy for depression: exploring therapist and client contributions
Autor(es)Cunha, Carla Alexandra Castro
Spínola, Joana
Gonçalves, Miguel M.
Palavras-chaveNarrative change
Innovative moments
Co-construction
Emergence
Data2012
EditoraItalian Area Group of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR Italy Area Group)
RevistaResearch in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome
Resumo(s)According to the narrative framework, clients seek therapeutic help due to the constricting nature of problematic self-narratives and psychotherapy should contribute to the elaboration of narrative novelties and innovative self-narratives. We term these narrative novelties as innovative moments (IMs) and developed the Innovative Moments Coding System (IMCS) to study them in psychotherapeutic discourse, differentiating five types of IMs: action, reflection, protest, reconceptualization and performing change IMs. Previous research studies using the IMCS with narrative therapy, emotion-focused therapy and client-centered therapy show that action, reflection and protest IMs appear in good (GO) and also in poor outcome (PO) cases while, reconceptualization and performing change IMs are more typical of good outcome (GO) cases. In this study, we will address how these IMs are co-constructed in the therapeutic dialogue through the discussion of three particular forms of IMs’ emergence in psychotherapy. These forms of emergence refer to different degrees of client and therapist participation: (1) IMs produced by the therapist and accepted by the client; (2) IMs prompted by the therapist and developed by the client; and (3) IMs spontaneously produced by the client. The exploratory analysis of three initial, three middle and three final sessions of contrasting cases (a GO and a PO) of narrative therapy for depression showed that IMs produced by the therapist were more associated to the PO case, while IMs prompted by the therapist were more associated to the GO case.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/56621
DOI10.7411/RP.2012.007
ISSN2499-7552
e-ISSN2239-8031
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Final paper.pdf278,94 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID