DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR

dc.commentsCEB55897por
dc.contributor.authorLima, Ângela Martinspor
dc.contributor.authorFrança, Ângela Maria Oliveira Sousapor
dc.contributor.authorMuzny, Christina A.por
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Christopher M.por
dc.contributor.authorCerca, Nunopor
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T11:47:44Z
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01
dc.date.issued2022-11-14
dc.date.updated2022-12-10T12:45:25Z
dc.description.abstractQuantitative PCR (qPCR) has become a widely used technique for bacterial quantification. The affordability, ease of experimental design, reproducibility, and robustness of qPCR experiments contribute to its success. The establishment of guidelines for minimum information for publication of qPCR experiments, now more than 10 years ago, aimed to mitigate the publication of contradictory data. Unfortunately, there are still a significant number of recent research articles that do not consider the main pitfalls of qPCR for quantification of biological samples, which undoubtedly leads to biased experimental conclusions. qPCR experiments have two main issues that need to be properly tackled: those related to the extraction and purification of genomic DNA and those related to the thermal amplification process. This mini-review provides an updated literature survey that critically analyzes the following key aspects of bacterial quantification by qPCR: (i) the normalization of qPCR results by using exogenous controls, (ii) the construction of adequate calibration curves, and (iii) the determination of qPCR reaction efficiency. It is primarily focused on original papers published last year, where qPCR was applied to quantify bacterial species in different types of biological samples, including multi-species biofilms, human fluids, and water and soil samples.por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.description.sponsorshipChristina A. Muzny, MD, MSPH, Christopher M. Taylor, PhD, Nuno Cerca, PhD and Ângela Lima, BSc, are currently funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI146065-01A1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation.por
dc.distributioninternationalpor
dc.identifier.citationLima, A., França, A., Muzny, C.A. et al. DNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106, 7993–8006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4por
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4por
dc.identifier.issn0175-7598por
dc.identifier.pmid36374332por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/81084
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherSpringer Naturepor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-022-12276-4por
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectBacterial load quantificationpor
dc.subjectgDNA extraction efficiencypor
dc.subjectqPCRpor
dc.subjectgDNA yieldpor
dc.subjectExogenous controlpor
dc.subjectCalibration curvepor
dc.subjectqPCR reaction efficiencypor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
dc.titleDNA extraction leads to bias in bacterial quantification by qPCRpor
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
oaire.citationConferencePlaceGermany
oaire.citationEndPage8006por
oaire.citationIssue24por
oaire.citationStartPage7993por
oaire.citationVolume106por
sdum.journalApplied Microbiology and Biotechnologypor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
document_55897_1.pdf
Tamanho:
1.49 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format