Assessing the accuracy of different remapping methods in adaptive mesh refinement

dc.contributor.authorMarques, B. M.por
dc.contributor.authorNeto, D. M.por
dc.contributor.authorAlves, J. L.por
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T11:12:10Z
dc.date.available2024-04-02T11:12:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2024-03-30T12:42:47Z
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing of metals has attracted much attention over the last years, promoting the development of several computational models for numerical simulation of the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. Nevertheless, the finite element analysis of the LPBF process requires a large computational time. Thus, adaptive mesh refinement strategies are commonly adopted to reduce computational cost, which require some remapping procedure to transfer the state variables from the old mesh to the new one. The present study analyses two different remapping algorithms, namely the Inverse Isoparametric Mapping (IIM) and the Dual Kriging (DK) method. The IIM method uses the shape functions of the finite elements, while the DK method provides an explicit parametric interpolation. The case study adopted covers both coarsening and refinement procedures, using a mathematical function to define the mapped state variable. The accuracy of the remapping methods was lower in the refinement in comparison with the coarsening procedure. The error in the approximation is lower using the DK method in comparison with the IIM method. However, the IIM method does not suffer from error propagation in successive stages of either refinement/derefinement or coarsening/decoarsening.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the projects POCI-01-0145-FEDER031657 (PTDC/EME-EME/31657/2017) and UIDB/00285/2020 financed by the Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization, in its FEDER/FNR component, and the Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology (FCT), in its State Budget component (OE). The first author is also grateful to the FCT for the PhD grant with reference 2020.05267.BD.por
dc.distributioninternationalpor
dc.identifier.citationMarques, B. M., Neto, D. M., & Alves, J. L. (2022). Assessing the Accuracy of Different Remapping Methods in Adaptive Mesh Refinement. In Key Engineering Materials (Vol. 926, pp. 316–322). Trans Tech Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-1r2x8gpor
dc.identifier.doi10.4028/p-1r2x8gpor
dc.identifier.isbn9783035717594por
dc.identifier.issn1013-9826
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/90355
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherTrans Tech Publicationspor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/9471 - RIDTI/PTDC%2FEME-EME%2F31657%2F2017/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F00285%2F2020/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_CENTRO/2020.05267.BD/PTpor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.scientific.net/KEM.926.316por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/por
dc.subjectDual Krigingpor
dc.subjectFinite element methodpor
dc.subjectRemapping state variablespor
dc.subjectShape functionspor
dc.titleAssessing the accuracy of different remapping methods in adaptive mesh refinementpor
dc.typeconferencePaperpor
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
oaire.citationEndPage322por
oaire.citationStartPage316por
oaire.citationVolume926por
sdum.export.identifier14920
sdum.journalKey Engineering Materialspor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
KEM.926.316.pdf
Tamanho:
835.03 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format