Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses

dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Cláudia Miriam Pereira
dc.contributor.authorLira, Madalena
dc.contributor.authorReal Oliveira, M. Elisabete C.D.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rosário
dc.contributor.authorAzeredo, Joana
dc.date.accessioned2005-12-15T13:17:32Z
dc.date.available2005-12-15T13:17:32Z
dc.date.issued2005-06
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The purpose of this study is to compare the adhesion capabilities of the most important etiologic agents of microbial ocular infection to the recently available silicone– hydrogel lenses with those to a conventional hydrogel lens. Methods. In vitro static adhesion assays of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10,145, Staphylococcus epidermidis 9142 (biofilm-positive), and 12,228 (biofilm-negative) to two extended-wear silicone– hydrogel lenses (balafilcon A and lotrafilcon A), a daily wear silicone– hydrogel lens (galyfilcon A) and a conventional hydrogel (etafilcon A) were performed. To interpret the adhesion results, lens surface relative hydrophobicity was assessed by water contact angle measurements. Results. P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis 9142 exhibited greater adhesion capabilities to the extended wear silicone– hydrogel lenses than to the daily wear silicone– and conventional hydrogel lenses (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between the adhesion extent of these strains to galyfilcon A and etafilcon A. The biofilm negative strain of S. epidermidis adhered in larger extents to the silicone– hydrogel lenses than to the conventional hydrogel (p < 0.05), but in much lower amounts than the biofilm-positive strain. The water contact angle measurements revealed that the extended wear silicone– hydrogel lenses are hydrophobic, whereas the daily wear silicone– and conventional hydrogel lenses are hydrophilic. Conclusions. As a result of their hydrophobicity, the extended wear silicone– hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A and balafilcon A) may carry higher risk of microbial contamination than both the hydrophilic daily wear silicone– hydrogel lens, galyfilcon A and the conventional hydrogel lens, etafilcon A.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)por
dc.distributioninternationaleng
dc.identifier.citation"Optometry and vision science". ISSN 1040-5488. 82:6 (Jun. 2005) 446-450.eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64por
dc.identifier.issn1040-5488eng
dc.identifier.pmid15976580por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/3652
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.peerreviewedyeseng
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Optometry (AAOPT)eng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectSilicone–hydrogel contact lenseseng
dc.subjectBacterial adhesioneng
dc.subjectHydrophobicityeng
dc.subjectP. aeruginosaeng
dc.subjectS. epidermidiseng
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
dc.titleAdhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenseseng
dc.typearticlepor
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
oaire.citationEndPage450por
oaire.citationIssue6por
oaire.citationStartPage446por
oaire.citationVolume82por
sdum.journalOptometry and vision sciencepor
sdum.number6eng
sdum.pagination446-450eng
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedeng
sdum.volume82eng

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
OVS-Henriques[1].pdf
Tamanho:
284.95 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format