On the efficiency-legitimacy trade-off in EMU

dc.commentsNIPE – Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas – is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through the Programa Operacional Ciência e Inovação 2010 (POCI 2010) of the III Quadro Comunitário de Apoio (QCA III), which is financed by FEDER and Portuguese funds.eng
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-05T21:41:52Z
dc.date.available2007-12-05T21:41:52Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.descriptionForthcoming in F. Torres, A. Verdun, and H. Zimmermann, EMU Rules: The Political and Economic Consequences of European Monetary Integration, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft I wish to thank Svetlozar Andreev, Stefano Bartolini, Annette Bongardt, Alessandra Chirico, Paul De Grauwe, Erik Jones, Philippe Schmitter, Suzanne Schüttemeyer, Amy Verdun, Neil Walker, Helen Wallace, Chiara Zilioli, Hubert Zimmermann and participants at the EUI conference and ECB seminar for very useful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Of course, all remaining errors and shortcomings are my sole responsibility.eng
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the question whether the process of European monetary integration implies efficiency-legitimacy trade-off. The paper considers that the process of monetary policy delegation to the European Central Bank (ECB), ratified by all European Union (EU) parliaments, was a non-zero-sum game, increasing both the efficiency and the legitimacy of monetary policy in the eurozone. There was however a change in the nature of delegation: the initial principal (EU national governments and/or parliaments) delegated to the agent (the ECB) control over its behaviour in regard to monetary policy. The paper distinguishes two types of constraints for monetary policy: credibility constraints and political constraints. The change in the nature of delegation of monetary policy (tying the hands of the principal) was a means of dealing with credibility constraints. The paper goes on investigating whether, and if so to what extent, the European Parliament (EP) is fit to function as a principal of the ECB as a means of dealing with political constraints. Thus, the paper analyses the European Parliament’s increased involvement in overseeing the Central Bank’s activities, aiming at understanding whether and how that new and special role (an informal institution of dialogue) could affect the trade-off between efficiency and legitimacy in the conduct of monetary policy in the eurozone.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is part of an FCT research project on Economic Growth, Convergence and Institutions (research grant POCI/EGE/55423/2004, partially funded by FEDER).eng
dc.identifier.citationNIPE Working Paper series; 22eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/7192
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas (NIPE)eng
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POCI/55423/PT
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectEconomic and Monetary Unioneng
dc.subjectMonetary policy delegationeng
dc.subjectEfficiency and legitimacyeng
dc.subjectAccountabilityeng
dc.subjectResponsivenesseng
dc.subjectPrincipal-agent relationseng
dc.subjectGovernanceeng
dc.titleOn the efficiency-legitimacy trade-off in EMUeng
dc.typeworkingPapereng
dspace.entity.typePublicationen

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
NIPE_WP_22_2007.pdf
Tamanho:
490.36 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Documento principal