Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica Enteritidis biofilms susceptibility to different disinfectants and stress-response and virulence gene expression of surviving cells

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Diana Alexandra Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorCerca, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, P.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rosário
dc.contributor.authorCeri, Howard
dc.contributor.authorAzeredo, Joana
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-27T11:11:08Z
dc.date.available2012-01-27T11:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractDisinfection of food contact surfaces is a challenging task, aggravated by bacteria's capacity to survive and/or resist antimicrobials by means of mechanisms not yet completely understood. This work evaluated the susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica biofilms to four disinfectants, and analyzed how those chemical agents influenced stress-response and virulence genes expression by surviving cells. Three strains of each bacterial species mentioned were used, and their biofilms were treated with sodium hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride, hydrogen peroxide, and triclosan using the Calgary Biofilm Device. Expression of L. monocytogenes and S. enterica stress-response genes cplC and ropS, and virulence genes prfA and avrA, respectively, was analyzed through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results showed sodium hypochlorite to have the lowest minimum biofilm eradication concentration values (3.125 mu g/ml), whereas triclosan had the worst performance since no S. enterica biofilm eradication was achieved even at the maximum concentration used (4,000 mu g/ml). L. monocytogenes stress-response gene and S. enterica virulence gene were significantly upregulated in surviving cells compared with controls. In general, this work points out sodium hypochlorite as the most effective disinfectant against biofilms of both species used, and L. monocytogenes biofilms to be more susceptible to disinfection than S. enterica biofilms. Moreover, it was found that disinfection surviving biofilm cells seem to develop a stress response and/or become more virulent, which may compromise food safety and potentiate public health risk.por
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors gratefully acknowledge the helpful contribution of Joana Bento and Angela Franca on the quantitative PCR assays. The authors acknowledge the financial support from Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through grants SFRH/BD/28887/2006 and SFRH/BPD/26803/2006, respectively.por
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/mdr.2010.0183por
dc.identifier.issn1076-6294por
dc.identifier.issn1931-8448por
dc.identifier.pmid21388333por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/16622
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebertpor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://online.liebertpub.com/por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
dc.titleListeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica Enteritidis biofilms susceptibility to different disinfectants and stress-response and virulence gene expression of surviving cellspor
dc.typearticlepor
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
oaire.citationEndPage189por
oaire.citationIssue2por
oaire.citationStartPage181por
oaire.citationTitleMicrobial Drug Resistancepor
oaire.citationVolume17por
sdum.journalMicrobial Drug Resistancepor
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
Artigo aceite_Microbial Drug Resistance.pdf
Tamanho:
3.62 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format