Unlocking the secrets of knee joint unloading: a systematic review and biomechanical study of the invasive and non-invasive methods and their influence on knee joint loading

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This review analyzes the effects of invasive and non-invasive methods of knee joint unloading on knee loading, employing a biomechanical model to evaluate their impact. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched up to 15 May 2024 to identify eligible clinical studies evaluating Joint Space Width, Cartilage Thickness, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score system, Gait velocity, Peak Knee Adduction Moment, time to return to sports and to work, ground reaction force, and the visual analogue scale pain score. A second search was conducted to select a biomechanical model that could be parametrized, including the modifications that each treatment would impose on the knee joint and was capable of estimate joint loading to compare the effectiveness of each method. Results: Analyzing 28 studies (1652 participants), including 16 randomized clinical trials, revealed significant improvements mainly when performing knee joint distraction surgery, increasing Joint Space Width even after removal, and high tibial osteotomy, which realigns the knee but does not reduce loading. Implantable shock absorbers are also an attractive option as they partially unload the knee but require further investigation. Non-invasive methods improve biomechanical indicators of knee joint loading; however, they lack quantitative analysis of cartilage volume or Joint Space Width. Conclusions: Current evidence indicates a clear advantage in knee joint unloading methods, emphasizing the importance of adapted therapy. However, more extensive research, particularly using non-invasive approaches, is required to further understand the underlying knee joint loading mechanisms and advance the state of the art.