Identification methods in newborn C57BL/6 mice: a developmental and behavioural evaluation

dc.contributor.authorCastelhano-Carlos, Magda Joãopor
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Nunopor
dc.contributor.authorOhl, F.por
dc.contributor.authorBaumans, V.por
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T15:15:22Z
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.description.abstractThe use of group-housed rodents in many fields of biomedical research imposes a need to identify individuals in a cage. Few studies have been designed to assess possible negative effects of identification methods of newborn mice on their development and wellbeing. In the present study, three different identification methods were applied to newborn C57BL/6J mice on postnatal day (pnd) 5 (toe clipping, toe tattoo ink puncture and subcutaneous implantation of a small transponder). All identification methods used proved to be effective for long-term marking of individual animals. Newborn mice showed the least reaction to toe clipping followed by toe tattoo ink puncture and transponder implantation was the most distressful individual identification procedure in newborn mice. Importantly, clipped toe tissue proved to be enough for genotyping purposes. No overall consistent differences in somatic and neurological reflex development during the postnatal period were shown as a result of the newborn individual identification procedures used. Further, none of the methods interfered significantly with the adult animals' general normal behaviour (e.g. ability to move, grasp, climb) and sensory-motor functions as assessed with a simplified SHIRPA battery of tests, as well as Rotarod and Elevated Plus Maze tests. Postmortem thymus and adrenal gland weights gave no indication of chronic stress as a consequence of the identification method. We conclude that toe clipping might even be advisable in newborn mice at a very young age, when genotyping is needed. Toe tattoo ink puncture is also a good identification method for newborn mice and transponder implantation should only be used in older newborns or applied at weaning.por
dc.description.sponsorshipAs this study was performed within the framework of the first author’s master thesis, thanks are due to Laboratory Animals Ltd for providing financial support.por
dc.distributioninternationalpor
dc.identifier.doi10.1258/la.2009.009044por
dc.identifier.eissn1758-1117
dc.identifier.issn0023-6772
dc.identifier.pmid19854756por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/64307
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationspor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1258/la.2009.009044por
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectAnimal Identification Systemspor
dc.subjectAnimalspor
dc.subjectAnimals, Laboratorypor
dc.subjectAnimals, Newbornpor
dc.subjectMicepor
dc.subjectMice, Inbred C57BLpor
dc.subjectReflexpor
dc.subjectIdentificationpor
dc.subjectMarkingpor
dc.subjectWellbeingpor
dc.subjectDevelopmentpor
dc.subjectBehaviourpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
dc.titleIdentification methods in newborn C57BL/6 mice: a developmental and behavioural evaluationpor
dc.typearticlepor
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
oaire.citationEndPage103por
oaire.citationIssue2por
oaire.citationStartPage88por
oaire.citationVolume44por
sdum.journalLaboratory Animalspor

Ficheiros

Pacote original

A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Nome:
Castelhano-carlos-2010-Identification-methods-in-newborn-c.pdf
Tamanho:
390.91 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format