Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/78687

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPagels, Fernandopor
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Ricardo Nuno Correiapor
dc.contributor.authorAmaro, Helena M.por
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Vitorpor
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, A. Catarinapor
dc.contributor.authorVicente, A. A.por
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-09T10:38:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-09T10:38:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-07-
dc.identifier.citationPagels, Fernando; Pereira, Ricardo N.; Amaro, Helena M.; Vasconcelos, Vitor; Teixeira-Guedes, Catarina Isabel; Vicente, António A., Pigments extraction from Cyanobium sp. a comparison between pressure-based and electric fields-based technologies. BioIberoAmerica 2022 - 3rd IberoAmerican Congress on Biotechnology. No. OP - (472), Braga, Portugal, Apr 7-9, 162, 2022.por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/78687-
dc.description.abstractPigments from cyanobacteria, in special carotenoids and phycobiliproteins, have been seen with considerable interest for industrial applications due to their bioactive properties and their natural product characteristics. The extraction of these compounds is focused on the methodologies of cell disruption and on the chemical solubility of the compounds. In this study, two different methods were optimised and evaluated in terms of pigments´ extraction from the marine cyanobacterium Cyanobium sp.: a continuous pressurized solvent extraction (CPSE) system, and an electric fields-assisted extraction system based in ohmic heating (OH). For each method, a Central Composite Design (23) was performed. Optimal conditions for each extraction method were then compared to determine the best method for the extraction of pigments from Cyanobium sp. In both optimisation and comparison steps, two extracts were obtained from the same biomass: an ethanolic extract (carotenoids-targeted) and a successive water extract (phycobiliproteins-targeted). The content and profile of carotenoids and phycobiliproteins and the respective antioxidant capacity of extracts were evaluated. OH provided the best ethanolic extract, with a carotenoids content of 41.6 ± 1.7 mg gDW-1, and total antioxidant capacity of 8.0 ± 0.3 mgTE gDW-1, representing an increase of 1.3-fold and 2.5-fold respectively, when compared to CPSE. Regarding the aqueous extract, both methods led to the same content of phycobiliprotein (135 ± 10.0 mg gDW-1), although OH led to an antioxidant capacity of this extract of 8.3 ± 0.3 mgTE gDW-1, 3.6-fold higher when compared to CPSE. In terms of profile, no major variation was found between extraction methods, being lutein, zeaxanthin, echinenone and -carotene the major carotenoids (>60 % of total carotenoids), and phycocyanin and allophycocyanin the only present phycobiliproteins (in a 1:2 ratio). In addition to the productivity and composition of the extracts, the design and applicability of the system must be considered. Once again, OH overtook the other methods due to the scalability and possible continuous operation. Overall, OH proved to be the best of the two methodologies for pigments co-extraction from Cyanobium sp..por
dc.description.sponsorshipA PhD fellowship (reference SFRH/BD/136767/2018) for author Fernando Pagels was granted by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) under the auspices of Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH), supported by the European Social Fund and Portuguese funds (MECTES). This work was financially co-supported by the strategical funding from FCT UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020 and UIDB/04469/2020; and the project ALGAVALOR – MicroALGAs: produção integrada e VALORização da biomassa e das suas diversas aplicações (POCI-01-0247-FEDER-035234), supported by the European Regional Development Fund and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte.-
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/SFRH%2FBD%2F136767%2F2018/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04423%2F2020/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04423%2F2020/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04469%2F2020/PT-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectcarotenoidspor
dc.subjectphycobiliproteinspor
dc.subjectantioxidant capacitypor
dc.subjectethanolic extractpor
dc.subjectaqueous extractpor
dc.subjectsuccessive extractionpor
dc.titlePigments extraction from Cyanobium sp. a comparison between pressure-based and electric fields-based technologiespor
dc.typeconferenceAbstractpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.bioiberoamerica2022.com/por
dc.commentsCEB55621por
oaire.citationStartPage162por
oaire.citationIssueOP - (472)-
oaire.citationConferencePlaceBraga, Portugalpor
dc.date.updated2022-07-09T10:08:41Z-
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
sdum.conferencePublicationBioIberoAmerica 2022 - 3rd IberoAmerican Congress on Biotechnologypor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Resumos em Livros de Atas / Abstracts in Proceedings

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_55621_1.pdf193,14 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID