Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/78687

TítuloPigments extraction from Cyanobium sp. a comparison between pressure-based and electric fields-based technologies
Autor(es)Pagels, Fernando
Pereira, Ricardo Nuno Correia
Amaro, Helena M.
Vasconcelos, Vitor
Guedes, A. Catarina
Vicente, A. A.
Palavras-chavecarotenoids
phycobiliproteins
antioxidant capacity
ethanolic extract
aqueous extract
successive extraction
Data7-Abr-2022
CitaçãoPagels, Fernando; Pereira, Ricardo N.; Amaro, Helena M.; Vasconcelos, Vitor; Teixeira-Guedes, Catarina Isabel; Vicente, António A., Pigments extraction from Cyanobium sp. a comparison between pressure-based and electric fields-based technologies. BioIberoAmerica 2022 - 3rd IberoAmerican Congress on Biotechnology. No. OP - (472), Braga, Portugal, Apr 7-9, 162, 2022.
Resumo(s)Pigments from cyanobacteria, in special carotenoids and phycobiliproteins, have been seen with considerable interest for industrial applications due to their bioactive properties and their natural product characteristics. The extraction of these compounds is focused on the methodologies of cell disruption and on the chemical solubility of the compounds. In this study, two different methods were optimised and evaluated in terms of pigments´ extraction from the marine cyanobacterium Cyanobium sp.: a continuous pressurized solvent extraction (CPSE) system, and an electric fields-assisted extraction system based in ohmic heating (OH). For each method, a Central Composite Design (23) was performed. Optimal conditions for each extraction method were then compared to determine the best method for the extraction of pigments from Cyanobium sp. In both optimisation and comparison steps, two extracts were obtained from the same biomass: an ethanolic extract (carotenoids-targeted) and a successive water extract (phycobiliproteins-targeted). The content and profile of carotenoids and phycobiliproteins and the respective antioxidant capacity of extracts were evaluated. OH provided the best ethanolic extract, with a carotenoids content of 41.6 ± 1.7 mg gDW-1, and total antioxidant capacity of 8.0 ± 0.3 mgTE gDW-1, representing an increase of 1.3-fold and 2.5-fold respectively, when compared to CPSE. Regarding the aqueous extract, both methods led to the same content of phycobiliprotein (135 ± 10.0 mg gDW-1), although OH led to an antioxidant capacity of this extract of 8.3 ± 0.3 mgTE gDW-1, 3.6-fold higher when compared to CPSE. In terms of profile, no major variation was found between extraction methods, being lutein, zeaxanthin, echinenone and -carotene the major carotenoids (>60 % of total carotenoids), and phycocyanin and allophycocyanin the only present phycobiliproteins (in a 1:2 ratio). In addition to the productivity and composition of the extracts, the design and applicability of the system must be considered. Once again, OH overtook the other methods due to the scalability and possible continuous operation. Overall, OH proved to be the best of the two methodologies for pigments co-extraction from Cyanobium sp..
TipoResumo em ata de conferência
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/78687
Versão da editorahttps://www.bioiberoamerica2022.com/
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Resumos em Livros de Atas / Abstracts in Proceedings

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_55621_1.pdf193,14 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID